I-D Action:draft-faltstrom-5892bis-01.txt

Mark Davis ☕ mark at macchiato.com
Wed Dec 22 22:34:58 CET 2010

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:42, Paul Hoffman <phoffman at imc.org> wrote:

> At 9:44 AM -0800 12/22/10, Mark Davis ? wrote:
> >So nobody should comment on any of the sentences having to do with the
> rationale for the backwards incompatibility?

My apologies for this sentence; it is hyperbolic. I'd thought I'd deleted
it, just leaving the "Should I have withheld comment" line.

However, it does feel like you are more concerned with the *form* of my
comment rather than the substance. To try to focus back on the substance,
let me just say that the following from Patrik's document should not be in
the document, for the reasons I outlined.
>IETF consensus
>is though that the changes are minor, and that it is important IDNA
>standard is aligned with the Unicode Standard.

Do you agree or disagree?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20101222/51fc872f/attachment.html>

More information about the Idna-update mailing list