Wikidna team final report
nicolas1.krebs3 at netcourrier.com
Thu Sep 17 23:58:32 CEST 2009
>Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 05:08:20 +0200
>From: Patrick Suger <psuger at gmail.com>
>I am reporting the WG/IDNABIS/LC grouped conclusions from those involved in
>5. we identified that:
>· UDN (user) were adequately supported by ISO 10646; Unicode could
>support additional canonization services; and IDNA supported features we can
>need in cases such as homography and majuscules, for example.
Do you mean that perdu.com and Perdu.com should be two different domain name?
More information about the Idna-update