Wikidna team final report

Nicolas Krebs nicolas1.krebs3 at
Thu Sep 17 23:58:32 CEST 2009

>Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 05:08:20 +0200
>From: Patrick Suger <psuger at>

>Dear Colleagues,
>I am reporting the WG/IDNABIS/LC grouped conclusions from those involved in

>5. we identified that:
>·         UDN (user) were adequately supported by ISO 10646; Unicode could
>support additional canonization services; and IDNA supported features we can
>need in cases such as homography and majuscules, for example.

Do you mean that and should be two different domain name?

More information about the Idna-update mailing list