[Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt
vint at google.com
Mon Oct 5 22:28:57 CEST 2009
make it so.
On Oct 5, 2009, at 4:27 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Monday, October 05, 2009 13:14 -0700 Kenneth Whistler
> <kenw at sybase.com> wrote:
>> Erik said:
>>> Yes, this change occurred between bidi draft versions 3 and
>>> 4, and is due to Mati's proposal. I believe he came up with
>>> that suggestion based purely on the bidi criteria (grouping,
>>> uniqueness), and not based on what was allowed/disallowed in
>>> the Table draft.
>> Then I think the editor needs to address that more explicitly,
>> particularly at the point in Section 2 that says what bidi
>> classes are allowed in labels, so as not to lead to exactly
>> the kind of misreading and confusion that Joel Halpern has
> IMO, that addition would probably be worthwhile even if "CS" is
> not removed. But that is just my opinion.
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update