[Gen-art] LC review: draft-ietf-idnabis-bidi-06.txt

John C Klensin klensin at jck.com
Mon Oct 5 22:27:37 CEST 2009

--On Monday, October 05, 2009 13:14 -0700 Kenneth Whistler
<kenw at sybase.com> wrote:

> Erik said:
>> Yes, this change occurred between bidi draft versions 3 and
>> 4, and is due to Mati's proposal. I believe he came up with
>> that suggestion based purely on the bidi criteria (grouping,
>> uniqueness), and not based on what was allowed/disallowed in
>> the Table draft.
> Then I think the editor needs to address that more explicitly,
> particularly at the point in Section 2 that says what bidi
> classes are allowed in labels, so as not to lead to exactly
> the kind of misreading and confusion that Joel Halpern has
> indicated.

IMO, that addition would probably be worthwhile even if "CS" is
not removed.  But that is just my opinion.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list