Consensus Call on Latin Sharp S and Greek Final Sigma
harald at alvestrand.no
Sun Nov 29 19:33:10 CET 2009
Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
> (2) Both characters should be DISALLOWED
> I think the way the question is phrased may mislead some people on
> this list./ The /*real*/ choice is between having them mapped to "ss"
> vs having them distinguished from "ss", because all browser vendors
> are planning to provide mappings, and I think all other vendors will
> be drawn down that path, for compatibility with the browsers.
I have heard your arguments, and I have made a conscious decision to
Long term, I don't want "pass.alvestrand.no" to have a ghost alias
"paß.alvestrand.no" that I can do nothing to stop people referring to -
or even detect that they refer to.
Mappings are, long term, a Bad Idea.
> This standard is not written in a vacuum; whether or not eszett and
> final-sigma would have been a better choice 7 years ago, billions of
> current browsers and other programs use the 2003 policies, and those
> would take years to change. In the meantime, a change of this
> magnitude from 2003 will cause significant problems.
> The people on this list need to carefully consider their positions,
> since they will not have to live with the compatibility and security
> problems; German and Greek speakers will. And it is telling that
> representatives like the German and Austrian NICs are in favor of
> continuing the 2003 policies of mapping the characters.
More information about the Idna-update