MVALID (was Re: M-Label or MVALID, and dangers with mappings?)
ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Mon Apr 13 19:09:25 CEST 2009
+1. Its been on my mind since the SF meeting, that to be sure we catch
everything (good bad and otherwise), it should be a stand alone
document. I have the cycles to edit, however I don't insist that I'm the
only, or best choice of editor.
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 02:34:24PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> If we're going to deal with mappings, I want it to be a separate
> I like that suggestion. It seems to me to enforce the separation of
> "here's the definition of IDNA2008" and "here are some things to make
> IDNA2008 work well with other stuff".
More information about the Idna-update