MVALID (was Re: M-Label or MVALID, and dangers with mappings?)

Eric Brunner-Williams ebw at
Mon Apr 13 19:09:25 CEST 2009

+1. Its been on my mind since the SF meeting, that to be sure we catch 
everything (good bad and otherwise), it should be a stand alone 
document. I have the cycles to edit, however I don't insist that I'm the 
only, or best choice of editor.


Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 02:34:24PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> If we're going to deal with mappings, I want it to be a separate 
>> document. 
> I like that suggestion.  It seems to me to enforce the separation of
> "here's the definition of IDNA2008" and "here are some things to make
> IDNA2008 work well with other stuff".
> A

More information about the Idna-update mailing list