MVALID (was Re: M-Label or MVALID, and dangers with mappings?)
patrik at frobbit.se
Mon Apr 13 19:06:41 CEST 2009
On 13 apr 2009, at 18.54, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 02:34:24PM -0500, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> If we're going to deal with mappings, I want it to be a separate
> I like that suggestion. It seems to me to enforce the separation of
> "here's the definition of IDNA2008" and "here are some things to make
> IDNA2008 work well with other stuff".
I also very much like this suggestion.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20090413/4432a687/attachment.pgp
More information about the Idna-update