Suggestion for rearranging -BIDI

[Harald Alvestrand]

Mark Davis wrote:
> I agree; the actual requirements should come first. (The rest could 
> either come second or even be moved to Rationale.)
That's not what's being proposed; the requirements are section 3, the 
rules are section 4, and the proposal is to put section 4 first. Are you 
supporting the proposal, or suggesting a different one?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:07, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no 
> <mailto:harald at alvestrand.no>> wrote:
>
>     I have had a suggestion from one participant to reorder the
>     material in
>     -bidi.
>
>     He suggests placing the actual rules (section 4) first (after intro),
>     followed by the rationale section, the requirements section and the
>     caveats/issues sections.
>
>     The current layout (intro, rationale, requirements, rules, caveats)
>     roughly reflects the thought stream that led to the document. It
>     seemed
>     rational to me at the time, but may not seem rational to a reader who
>     comes at it out of the blue.
>
>     What do other readers think of this?
>
>                        Harald
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Idna-update mailing list
>     Idna-update at alvestrand.no <mailto:Idna-update at alvestrand.no>
>     http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>