Suggestion for rearranging -BIDI
Harald Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Tue Nov 18 20:03:23 CET 2008
Mark Davis wrote:
> I agree; the actual requirements should come first. (The rest could
> either come second or even be moved to Rationale.)
That's not what's being proposed; the requirements are section 3, the
rules are section 4, and the proposal is to put section 4 first. Are you
supporting the proposal, or suggesting a different one?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 06:07, Harald Alvestrand <harald at alvestrand.no
> <mailto:harald at alvestrand.no>> wrote:
>
> I have had a suggestion from one participant to reorder the
> material in
> -bidi.
>
> He suggests placing the actual rules (section 4) first (after intro),
> followed by the rationale section, the requirements section and the
> caveats/issues sections.
>
> The current layout (intro, rationale, requirements, rules, caveats)
> roughly reflects the thought stream that led to the document. It
> seemed
> rational to me at the time, but may not seem rational to a reader who
> comes at it out of the blue.
>
> What do other readers think of this?
>
> Harald
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no <mailto:Idna-update at alvestrand.no>
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list