AW: Oustanding issues tracking

Georg Ochsner g.ochsner at
Tue May 27 15:43:27 CEST 2008

- unresolved: SHARP S

I would like to mention the open "sharp s" issue here. 

Can we please keep this in mind and/or on the TODO list.


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: idna-update-bounces at
[mailto:idna-update-bounces at] Im Auftrag von Patrik Fältström
Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 08:46
An: debbie at
Cc: idna-update at; 'Shawn Steele'
Betreff: Re: Oustanding issues tracking

On 23 maj 2008, at 20.04, Debbie Garside wrote:

> I am assuming that this is how Editors are working in this
> group i.e. they are reading the emails and changing the document
> accordingly, so it shouldn't be too onerous.

Given the number of email messages on this mailing list that either  
(a) are declared out of scope after about 20 messages or (b) long  
threads that do not lead to consensus, the number of issues is very  
very very small if one compare with the number of email messages.

Other wg's have more focused discussions. And because of that what you  
suggest works better in those wg's.

In this wg, much better if each person that have issues have their  

There are btw VERY FEW people (about 4) that have sent issues and  
suggestions to the tables document. So few that I rather see them  
keeping their lists.


Idna-update mailing list
Idna-update at

More information about the Idna-update mailing list