AW: Oustanding issues tracking
g.ochsner at revolistic.com
Tue May 27 15:43:27 CEST 2008
- unresolved: SHARP S
I would like to mention the open "sharp s" issue here.
Can we please keep this in mind and/or on the TODO list.
Von: idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:idna-update-bounces at alvestrand.no] Im Auftrag von Patrik Fältström
Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 08:46
An: debbie at ictmarketing.co.uk
Cc: idna-update at alvestrand.no; 'Shawn Steele'
Betreff: Re: Oustanding issues tracking
On 23 maj 2008, at 20.04, Debbie Garside wrote:
> I am assuming that this is how Editors are working in this
> group i.e. they are reading the emails and changing the document
> accordingly, so it shouldn't be too onerous.
Given the number of email messages on this mailing list that either
(a) are declared out of scope after about 20 messages or (b) long
threads that do not lead to consensus, the number of issues is very
very very small if one compare with the number of email messages.
Other wg's have more focused discussions. And because of that what you
suggest works better in those wg's.
In this wg, much better if each person that have issues have their
There are btw VERY FEW people (about 4) that have sent issues and
suggestions to the tables document. So few that I rather see them
keeping their lists.
Idna-update mailing list
Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update