Archaic scripts (was: Re:
New version:draft-ietf-idna-tables-01.txt)
Gervase Markham
gerv at mozilla.org
Thu May 8 20:28:04 CEST 2008
Vint Cerf wrote:
> I interpret your position to lie mostly on the utility axis and your
> argument to be of the form "it isn't useful to include these scripts"
>
> Others may say, "but what's the harm?"
I would note that this line of argument got us where we are today. As I
have understood the process thus far, one of the big differences in
IDNAbis will be that someone needs to provide a positive reason to
include a character or set rather than forcing someone else to provide a
positive reason to exclude it.
On the cuneiform point, only a handful of people worldwide have
keyboards set up to type those letters, and only a further handful have
fonts to display them. Even if that small group wants to set up a
website about cuneiform (entirely possible) that doesn't mean it
requires a cuneiform domain name - and, in fact, if it had one, it would
significantly restrict its readership.
If cuneiform gets in, IMO it would be a sign that the process is still
broken in the way outlined above.
Gerv
More information about the Idna-update
mailing list