Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation
vint at google.com
Wed Mar 26 06:39:41 CET 2008
works for me too.
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 10:20 PM -0400 3/25/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>> --On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 18:24 -0700 Mark Davis
>> <mark.davis at icu-project.org> wrote:
>>> That works for me. Item (iii) needs fleshing out a bit.
>>> (iii) A change to the basic approach taken in
>>> the design team documents.
>>> It is clear when a change would violate (i) or (ii) would be,
>>> but not clear what kind of change would violate (iii).
>> I more or less copied that, with some slight re-wording, from
>> the last version that was posted. I would welcome narrower
>> language, but am also not sure it is necessary.
> Given that a few people expressed confusion on that wording, it
> seems necessary. How about:
> (iii) A change to the approach in the design team documents (a
> protocol that is independent of Unicode versions, that removes any
> character mapping in the protocol, and has improvements to the bidi
> That does not cover all the changes between IDNA2003 and the design
> team design, (see <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-
> hoffman-idna200x-topics-01.txt>), but it covers the high points
> that could cause a charter refresh.
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update