Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation
mark.davis at icu-project.org
Wed Mar 26 04:34:40 CET 2008
Works for me too.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 8:22 PM, John C Klensin <klensin at jck.com> wrote:
> That works for me. Thanks.
> --On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 20:13 -0700 Paul Hoffman
> <phoffman at imc.org> wrote:
> > At 10:20 PM -0400 3/25/08, John C Klensin wrote:
> >> --On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 18:24 -0700 Mark Davis
> >> <mark.davis at icu-project.org> wrote:
> >>> That works for me. Item (iii) needs fleshing out a bit.
> >>> (iii) A change to the basic approach taken in
> >>> the design team documents.
> >>> It is clear when a change would violate (i) or (ii) would
> >>> be, but not clear what kind of change would violate (iii).
> >> I more or less copied that, with some slight re-wording, from
> >> the last version that was posted. I would welcome narrower
> >> language, but am also not sure it is necessary.
> > Given that a few people expressed confusion on that wording,
> > it seems necessary. How about:
> > (iii) A change to the approach in the design team documents (a
> > protocol that is independent of Unicode versions, that removes
> > any character mapping in the protocol, and has improvements to
> > the bidi algorithm).
> > That does not cover all the changes between IDNA2003 and the
> > design team design, (see
> > <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoffman-idna200x-to
> > pics-01.txt>), but it covers the high points that could cause
> > a charter refresh.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Idna-update