Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation
phoffman at imc.org
Wed Mar 26 04:13:50 CET 2008
At 10:20 PM -0400 3/25/08, John C Klensin wrote:
>--On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 18:24 -0700 Mark Davis
><mark.davis at icu-project.org> wrote:
>> That works for me. Item (iii) needs fleshing out a bit.
>> (iii) A change to the basic approach taken in
>> the design team documents.
>> It is clear when a change would violate (i) or (ii) would be,
>> but not clear what kind of change would violate (iii).
>I more or less copied that, with some slight re-wording, from
>the last version that was posted. I would welcome narrower
>language, but am also not sure it is necessary.
Given that a few people expressed confusion on that wording, it seems
necessary. How about:
(iii) A change to the approach in the design team documents (a
protocol that is independent of Unicode versions, that removes any
character mapping in the protocol, and has improvements to the bidi
That does not cover all the changes between IDNA2003 and the design
team design, (see
but it covers the high points that could cause a charter refresh.
More information about the Idna-update