Charter, changes in prefixes, and documentation

John C Klensin klensin at
Wed Mar 26 03:20:25 CET 2008

--On Tuesday, 25 March, 2008 18:24 -0700 Mark Davis
<mark.davis at> wrote:

> That works for me. Item (iii) needs fleshing out a bit.
>                (iii) A change to the basic approach taken in
> the design                team documents.
> It is clear when a change would violate (i) or (ii) would be,
> but not clear what kind of change would violate (iii).

I more or less copied that, with some slight re-wording, from
the last version that was posted.   I would welcome narrower
language, but am also not sure it is necessary.


More information about the Idna-update mailing list