Comments on idnabis-tables-02
patrik at frobbit.se
Mon Jul 28 15:50:17 CEST 2008
On 17 jul 2008, at 08.50, Marcos Sanz/Denic wrote:
> the document looks to me in very good shape, here comes some
> * For the whole document: There should be a decision on whether "code
> point" or "codepoint" is the correct spelling.
After looking at some Unicode Documentation, I decided on "code point".
> * Section 1: s/Unicod/Unicode/
Done (two of your found this) :-)
> * Section 9.1: s/M. Durst/M. xn--Drst-0ra/
> (tired of frequent misspellings, he wrote once a full essay on how to
> correctly write his name down, including the preferred ASCII
> encoding. I can't find the link now, but I think it was "Duerst", or
> least he writes so himself when writing RFCs :-)
What I found in the mailing lists etc, is that Duerst is what he uses.
Martin, I hope you speak up here if you are unhappy with this!
> * Section 9.2: IDNA2008-Bidi, RFC 1035 and RFC 4713 are not referenced
> anywhere in the text. Let's drop them.
More information about the Idna-update