Comments on idnabis-tables-02

Patrik Fältström patrik at
Mon Jul 28 15:50:17 CEST 2008

On 17 jul 2008, at 08.50, Marcos Sanz/Denic wrote:

> the document looks to me in very good shape, here comes some  
> nitpicking:
> * For the whole document: There should be a decision on whether "code
> point" or "codepoint" is the correct spelling.

After looking at some Unicode Documentation, I decided on "code point".

> * Section 1: s/Unicod/Unicode/

Done (two of your found this) :-)

> * Section 9.1: s/M. Durst/M. xn--Drst-0ra/
> (tired of frequent misspellings, he wrote once a full essay on how to
> correctly write his name down, including the preferred ASCII  
> compatible
> encoding. I can't find the link now, but I think it was "Duerst", or  
> at
> least he writes so himself when writing RFCs :-)

What I found in the mailing lists etc, is that Duerst is what he uses.

Martin, I hope you speak up here if you are unhappy with this!

> * Section 9.2: IDNA2008-Bidi, RFC 1035 and RFC 4713 are not referenced
> anywhere in the text. Let's drop them.



More information about the Idna-update mailing list