Proposed document structure and content for IDNA

Paul Hoffman phoffman at
Fri Jul 11 00:23:51 CEST 2008

At 12:16 AM +0200 7/11/08, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>But I'd still like an overview in the style of
>the "rationale" defining some basic terms such
>as A-label and U-label, and/or a memo about the
><toplabel> issue with hardcore ABNF.  Limited to
>what implementors need to know when they intend
>to support A-labels incl. A-<toplabel>s in their
>code as some opaque gibberish that should work.

I would expect that the single unified document would define A-label 
and U-label because those are needed for the protocol. We don't need 
a rationale for those, just good definitions.

More information about the Idna-update mailing list