Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?

[Vint Cerf]

seems odd to me too, James.

vint


On Jul 3, 2008, at 6:14 PM, James Seng wrote:

>> At the moment, the condition is "no single Unicode code point." To
>> the extent that a single CJK ideograph can be expressed using a
>> single Unicode code point, this would represent the situation to
>> which you say you would object. I will dig through my notes to find
>> out why the "single character" condition was adopted -
>
> Would you be able to explain why the condition is "no single Unicode
> code point"? Whats the technical basis for that?
>
> -James Seng
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update