Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes?
james at seng.sg
Fri Jul 4 00:14:41 CEST 2008
> At the moment, the condition is "no single Unicode code point." To
> the extent that a single CJK ideograph can be expressed using a
> single Unicode code point, this would represent the situation to
> which you say you would object. I will dig through my notes to find
> out why the "single character" condition was adopted -
Would you be able to explain why the condition is "no single Unicode
code point"? Whats the technical basis for that?
More information about the Idna-update