New version, draft-faltstrom-idnabis-tables-02.txt, available

Patrik Fältström patrik at
Tue Jun 19 22:26:52 CEST 2007

On 19 jun 2007, at 21.35, Mark Davis wrote:

> If *that* notion of stability is all that is being talked about,  
> then it is
> very easy, and we have done it with a number of Unicode properties.  
> Define
> the following:
> Each script other than the archaic ones is no more problematic  
> overall than
> the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic you have already included. Thus if you
> include Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic, you should include them:

You can find this out easier than I...

If we use the rules we have in the document today, what codepoints  
would have moved from ALWAYS to NEVER and vice versa between 3.2 and  

I do not have all the (historical) tables available...

I think this might be interesting to know in this discussion, but  
also I guess I should explain why we do not expect any further such  
change in the same scripts when moving forward.

Regarding your suggestions on additional explanation, I thank you for  


More information about the Idna-update mailing list