[R-C] BoF approved

[Michael Welzl]

Hi,

Regarding the question that Wes raises below:

I think that we all want to work with RTP itself.
Actually it was me who started with that all-over-SCTP idea, and I did  
that in thinking that the scope would be for rtcweb and nothing but  
rtcweb.

I now understand that the scope can be broader than that, and would  
like to see it broader, just like pretty much everyone else, it seems  
to me.
Because of that, I would like to undo my all-over-SCTP proposal back.  
I think it's a bad idea because it limits everything we do to the  
rtcweb scope alone.

I believe that we probably have consensus about that. Does anyone  
disagree?

Cheers,
Michael


On Jun 26, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Wesley Eddy wrote:

> The RMCAT BoF was approved to meet at IETF 84 in Vancouver.
>
> BoF chairs will be announced soon.
>
> When it was discussed by the IESG and IAB, one topic that really
> needs to be clarified by/within the group is the scope of the
> mechanisms being developed.  For instance, it needs to be more
> clear what stack the group wants to be chartered to operate on.
> Whether the group would be doing a mechanism that works for RTP
> itself, or a new SCTP mechanism will need to be very clear.
>
> -- 
> Wes Eddy
> MTI Systems
> _______________________________________________
> Rtp-congestion mailing list
> Rtp-congestion at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/rtp-congestion