[R-C] Charter update

[Michael Welzl]

On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Matt Mathis wrote:

>> /• Reasonable share of bandwidth when competing with RMCAT traffic,  
>> other
>> real-time media protocols, TCP and other congestion control  
>> protocols. A
>> 'reasonable share' means that no flow has a significantly negative  
>> impact
>> [RFC5033] on other flows and at minimum that no flow starves./
>
> This does not work.   The hedging language for TCP in the previous
> text ("idealy") is required because protecting RMCAT from TCP (and
> other protocols such as LEDBAT) can't be solved in general within the
> scope of this WG.    We can try, and there are some partial solutions
> that will help some of the time, but there are no general solutions
> that really solve this problem.
>
> Adding the definition of reasonable share is fine.

So, the final thing could become:

>> /• Reasonable share of bandwidth when competing with RMCAT traffic,  
>> other
>> real-time media protocols, TCP and other congestion control  
>> protocols. A
>> 'reasonable share' means that, ideally, no flow has a significantly  
>> negative impact
>> [RFC5033] on other flows and at minimum that no flow starves./

(I just added "ideally" to Bob's text above)

??

Cheers,
Michael