Moving the process document forward

[Keith Moore]

> You are right at the end of the day, the IESG has to take some action 
> (leaving open the possible view that to take no action is to take 
> action)
> 
> I think there are two paths:
> 
> - they can figure it out a process on their own.
> or
> - the Problem WG can come up with a suggestion it reaches consensus on 
> and after being reviewed by the IETF in LC it is sent to the IESG.

let's just say I hope they do the former, because if we wait for this WG to do
the latter then it will delay any useful change by probably a year.  IMHO.

of course, if the IESG waits for this WG to get consensus on whether it should
act now or later, it will take even longer.