New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-03

[MURATA Makoto]

> 
> 
> Actually, it would be RFC2616, not RFC2068. 

Oops, my apologies!

>Furthermore, we're actually 
> doing this in the IETF HTTPbis Working Group.

Yes, I was aware of this activity.

> So let's rephrase it... do you have an opinion whether an update to 
> HTTP/1.1 *should* make this change?

I believe that the RFCs for XML media type should faithfully follow MIME 
and HTTP/1.1.  When the first RFC for XML media types was created, I was
told that neither MIME RFCs nor HTTP/1.1 can be changed here.  Ten years
have passed since then.  I think that facts (ideally based on statistics 
of correct/incorrect charset) should be documented first and then a
required change (if any) should be introduced.

Cheers,

-- 
MURATA Makoto <murata at hokkaido.email.ne.jp>