New Version Notification for draft-murata-kohn-lilley-xml-03

[Julian Reschke]

MURATA Makoto wrote:
>> So how about changing it just for the HTTP transport then?
> 
> You are proposing to fix HTTP 1.1.  Then, you would need to write an
> internet draft which would obsolete RFC 2068 and have it approved 
> by IESG.
> ...

Actually, it would be RFC2616, not RFC2068. Furthermore, we're actually 
doing this in the IETF HTTPbis Working Group.

So let's rephrase it... do you have an opinion whether an update to 
HTTP/1.1 *should* make this change?

BR, Julian