Registration of media type application/xtm+xml

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* Paul Libbrecht
> 
> Why not be more precise such as "any tool that can process or produce topics and relationships among them about any possible entity; this has included, in the past, ... and your list...".

Hmmmm. Well. Unfortunately, this isn't entirely true, as it takes a bit more than that to support Topic Maps. But I could turn it around and make it something like this:

 Applications which use this media type: Any tool which can process
 or produce data according to the Topic Maps Data Model. This has
 included in the past generic Topic Maps tools, web portals, product
 configuration tools, e-learning systems, and a variety of web
 services and web service clients.

Would this work?

> I would agree you have no reason to be more precise than RDF but indeed, their statement is bloated.

It's pretty vague, yes.

> Maybe it would be possible from this paragraph to deduce that you have similar ambitions to RDF?

I hope it would, but it's kind of hard for me as an insider to judge.

--Lars M.
http://www.garshol.priv.no/tmphoto/
http://www.garshol.priv.no/blog/