Media type for output of POSIX "diff" utility
Lisa Dusseault
lisa at osafoundation.org
Thu May 31 21:44:21 CEST 2007
On May 31, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> The reason why I am looking into this is that it would be great to
> revive HTTP PATCH, for which in turn it would be good to have a
> registered MIME type for "patch" payloads. In that case, the patch
> itself would always apply to a single resource (at the Request-
> URI). But that's of course only one use case...
It would be great to revive HTTP PATCH. Another thing I was looking
into for that was officially registering application/gdiff (http://
w3.org/TR/NOTE-gdiff-19970901) but I'd guess that's not as widely
used as "diff" and "diff -e".
The patent situation around application/gdiff's format is uncertain
and I never got a response from the spec authors around that. That
was the major stumbling block since there's a field in the
registration form for that. Perhaps the next step would be to see if
we can *document* the unclear patent situation (a simple mention)
rather than try to resolve it.
Lisa
More information about the Ietf-types
mailing list