Spanglish

[Phillips, Addison]

There would be nothing wrong with that, if there is a limited number of these in practical fact.

Aren’t these sort of pidgin-like constructs? An alternative might be that they all take ‘cpe’ (or similar) as a prefix?

From: Ietf-languages [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Doug Ewell
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2016 1:45 PM
To: Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>; ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org>
Subject: Re: Spanglish

Aren't there several different hybrids of this type? I keep reading about Franglais, Hinglish, etc. Do we want to register these one at a time?


--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org

-------- Original message --------
From: Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com<mailto:everson at evertype.com>>
Date: 12/19/16 14:32 (GMT-07:00)
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion <ietf-languages at iana.org<mailto:ietf-languages at iana.org>>
Subject: Re: Spanglish

What about es-spanglis (cf boont)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20161219/2989b264/attachment.html>