Variant subtag request: iso91995

[John Cowan]

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Avram Lyon <ajlyon at ucla.edu> wrote:

> I'll submit a revised requests for iso1995a and iso1995b with this information.

Are you sure the B table actually exists in ISO 9:1995 itself?  I
think it may have been introduced by GOST.  WP says that ISO 9 has
three tables (contemporary Slavic Cyrillic, historic Cyrillic, and
non-Slavic Cyrillic), but there is no suggestion of anything but a 1:1
transliteration of Cyrillic letters to Latin ones.

> One more question on prefixes -- should I list all the affected
> languages in the requested record? That'll make for a long field, and
> we didn't do it for alalc97.

I see no need for that.  Any language written in Cyrillic that does
not require letters outside the ISO 9 repertoire can be transliterated
by ISO 9.