Outstanding requests

[Mark Davis ☕]

As for #2, I want to do a revision, but haven't had the time yet. Hope to in
the coming weeks.

As for #1, I don't see a good reason not to do it. (As I mentioned, CLDR has
a more extensive structure for that kind of data, but for people not using
CLDR, for any languages with an extensive written corpus it is better to
have SS than not).

Mark

*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*


On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:56, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> 1.  What is the current status of Peter's preliminary proposal to add
> Suppress-Script to 48 existing records?  Is it being rejected on
> principle, or should registration forms and revised records be put
> together and posted?
>
> 2.  What is the current status of Mark's proposal to register variants
> 'respell' and 'vowels' (possibly with different subtag values)?
>
> --
> Doug Ewell | Thornton, Colorado, USA | http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14 | ietf-languages @ is dot gd slash 2kf0s ­
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20101028/116da8cf/attachment.html>