ISO 639-3 releases list of 2009 changes

[Mark Davis ☕]

I'm not making myself clear.

If the argument is that ISO 639-3 can't make a change in X *because **the
Ethnologue says Y, *it doesn't hold water, because the Ethnologue is neither
part of nor normatively referenced by ISO 639-3.

Mark


On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 16:58, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:

>
> On 23 Jan 2010, at 00:12, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:
>
> > You're missing (or at least not responding to) most of my message.
> >
> > 1) The ethnologue is not normative.
>
> Neither is the analysis of the ISO 639 committee, or of the UTC and
> WG2, or of Google.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20100122/f03ef2c6/attachment-0001.htm