I'm not making myself clear.<div><br></div><div>If the argument is that ISO 639-3 can't make a change in X <b>because </b><i><b>the Ethnologue says Y</b>, </i>it doesn't hold water, because the Ethnologue is neither part of nor normatively referenced by ISO 639-3.<div>
<br clear="all">Mark<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 16:58, Michael Everson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:everson@evertype.com">everson@evertype.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On 23 Jan 2010, at 00:12, Mark Davis ☕ wrote:<br>
<br>
> You're missing (or at least not responding to) most of my message.<br>
><br>
> 1) The ethnologue is not normative.<br>
<br>
</div>Neither is the analysis of the ISO 639 committee, or of the UTC and<br>
WG2, or of Google.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Michael Everson * <a href="http://www.evertype.com/" target="_blank">http://www.evertype.com/</a><br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Ietf-languages mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no">Ietf-languages@alvestrand.no</a><br>
<a href="http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages" target="_blank">http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>