Korean romanizations (Was: Japanese transliteration: ja-Latn-hepburn)
Kent Karlsson
kent.karlsson14 at comhem.se
Sat Sep 12 21:32:08 CEST 2009
Den 2009-09-12 21.03, skrev "Doug Ewell" <doug at ewellic.org>:
> I am not talking about embarking down any slippery slopes. We have
>
variants for Chinese romanizations and are about to register variants
for
> Japanese romanizations. It's not unheard of to discuss Chinese,
Japanese,
> and Korean issues together (I believe there's even an
initialism used to
> refer to those three) and I thought it would be
helpful to think about Korean
> romanizations while our minds were focused
that way.
I agree.
> Apparently Randy feels
> we should not draw from experience in
this particular way, so I guess we'll
> wait until someone comes with an urgent, pressing business need to tag Yale
> or McCune-Reischauer, and
then we'll engage in this lengthy "generic vs.
> specific" debate all over
again.
No requester so far has been interrogated as to any "urgent, pressing
business need" w.r.t. their requests, and I see no reason to start now.
/kent k
More information about the Ietf-languages
mailing list