New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for ISO 15924-based updates)

[Phillips, Addison]

FWIW, note that the 4646bis draft does allow the original requester to modify the request without restarting the clock (there is still a minimum one week time period before an updated record can be approved; review periods are still in two week segments). We are not under 4646bis now, of course. 

Addison

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect -- Lab126

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Peter Constable
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 8:27 AM
> To: Michael Everson; ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: RE: New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for
> ISO 15924-based updates)
> 
> It is not unprecedented in terms of ensuring adequate opportunity
> for review.
> 
> E.g. in ISO process, technical changes cannot be made without a
> ballot period after which reactive changes can be made.
> 
> Resetting the clock for technical changes is the mechanism
> applicable here to ensure last minute technical changes can't be
> made without adequate opportunity for review.
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 1:12 AM
> To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: Re: New record and form for 'Zinh' (was: Re: Last call for
> ISO 15924-based updates)
> 
> On 21 Mar 2009, at 04:01, Doug Ewell wrote:
> 
> >> WHAT? For the gods' sake, then when I change by adding a comma,
> >> that will start it again?
> >
> > No, that wouldn't be a substantive technical change.
> 
> This is an informative comment, added by consensus to something
> under
> review. I did not say "restart the clock". Why does the clock have
> to
> be restarted EVERY TIME? This is unprecedented in what I would call
> "normal" standardization. Can't we use our intelligence?
> 
> >
> 
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages