A stake in the ground

[Doug Ewell]

John Cowan <cowan at ccil dot org> wrote:

> In my view, none of the candidates for change to macrolanguage status 
> should be usable as prefixes in extlang records.

Is that your view:

(a) because you believe RFC 5646, Section 3.4 (12.C.2) recommends 
against it, or

(b) because you believe none of the candidates meets the criterion 
described in RFC 5645, Section 2.2, second paragraph?

--
Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­