CE Whitehead cewcathar at
Tue Sep 23 17:29:34 CEST 2008


I am happy with the compromise-- [acad1959] -- if Yuri and other speakers are.  (An alternative--if the particular standard referred to needs to be specified but a more generic subtag is to be registered first--would be to register a subtag like akademia and then add additional variants indicating the years of the standard as needed.  But by doing things this way we are saving a step--at least until a new standard becomes the norm.

--C. E. Whitehead
cewcathar at

From: Michael Everson 
Subject: Re:
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion 

> I agree completely with Yury here. I am convinced that

> 1959acad is the
> most suitable and appropriate subtag. I urge you all to approve> the
> compromise registration I put forward today.

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list