BCP47 Appeals process
yury.tarasievich at gmail.com
Thu Sep 18 13:44:51 CEST 2008
Mark Davis wrote:
> The request is for the broad tag (#1).
I'd support such broad subtag in the form "-academic" (or "-academy").
It would even be 100% correct, factually, as there were no Academy
before 1929, and so all the codifications of the (broadly) post-reform
style (1930 (project), 1934, 1959, 2010?) were developed there, and no
codification of the non-post-reform style was developed there.
More information about the Ietf-languages