LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (R3): pinyin

[Debbie Garside]

With regard to matching I agree with Randy and Peter - zh-latn is preferable
 
best regards
 
Debbie


  _____  

From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
[mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
Sent: 04 September 2008 17:53
To: ietflang IETF Languages Discussion
Subject: Re: LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (R3): pinyin


Who of you now disagrees with this? 

On 4 Sep 2008, at 17:08, Peter Constable wrote:


I agree completely.

Peter



-----Original Message-----


From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-


bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn



I agree with Kent's assessment that zh-latn is preferable.


Taken with the earlier points made with regard to matching,


I would like to see zh-latn as the only prefix *at* *this* *time*,


recognizing that one with cmn- should be added as soon as


is practical.  Though I think we can expect to encounter some


of these without the -latn, I think we should not do anything


to encourage such usage.



Randy


_______________________________________________


Ietf-languages mailing list


Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no


http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages



_______________________________________________
Ietf-languages mailing list
Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages





Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com <http://www.evertype.com/> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080904/4c57f061/attachment.htm