LANGUAGE SUBTAG REGISTRATION FORM (R3): pinyin

[Michael Everson]

Who of you now disagrees with this?

On 4 Sep 2008, at 17:08, Peter Constable wrote:

> I agree completely.
>
> Peter
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
>> bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
>
>> I agree with Kent's assessment that zh-latn is preferable.
>> Taken with the earlier points made with regard to matching,
>> I would like to see zh-latn as the only prefix *at* *this* *time*,
>> recognizing that one with cmn- should be added as soon as
>> is practical.  Though I think we can expect to encounter some
>> of these without the -latn, I think we should not do anything
>> to encourage such usage.
>>
>> Randy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf-languages mailing list
>> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
>> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-languages/attachments/20080904/163149cc/attachment.htm