Duplicate Busters: Survey #2

[Doug Ewell]

CE Whitehead <cewcathar at hotmail dot com> wrote:

> However if we can render these marks correctly then we should provide 
> a spelling with them as well as Romanized spellings--all alternatives 
> (if the spelling looks different from what I am used to seeing I get 
> confused; I do not get so confused if I see two or three spellings and 
> one looks exactly--marks and all (or absence of marks if I am used to 
> browsers that do not render them)--like what I am used to seeing.

I interpret this as another vote in favor of maintaining the status quo 
with regard to alternate spellings.  (The word "vote" is not to be taken 
literally, as this is just community input for Michael to make a 
decision.)

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ