Modification Request: dsb et al. (Suppress-Script: Latn)

[Debbie Garside]

I believe Michael is entitled to a personal opinion.  I also believe Michael
said " Again, if people want these registered, I will not disapprove."

Best regards

Debbie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no
> [mailto:ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of
> Peter Constable
> Sent: 22 October 2007 17:24
> To: Michael Everson; IETF Languages Discussion
> Subject: RE: Modification Request: dsb et al. (Suppress-Script: Latn)
>
> Procedural objection:
>
> As LSTR, your job is to process requests, not to second-guess
> the process. If there are concerns about the request raised
> during the discussion, then you can say you will not approve
> it as there is not consensus. But IMO *this* is not the place
> for you to discuss whether there's a practical need. If it's
> requested and nobody objects, you register it. If there is a
> question of appropriateness, that is an objection that would
> get raised, and you make a decision not to register on that
> basis. But somebody, including the LSTR, saying they don't
> have a need is not a valid basis for blocking the request.
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ietf-languages-bounces at alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages-
> > bounces at alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Michael Everson
> > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:10 AM
> > To: IETF Languages Discussion
> > Subject: Re: Modification Request: dsb et al.
> (Suppress-Script: Latn)
> >
> > At 18:12 -0700 2007-10-20, Doug Ewell wrote:
> > >It's been almost three weeks since Frank Ellermann
> submitted his list
> > >of Suppress-Script requests, so I think some sort of
> resolution needs
> > >to be decided upon, and announced to the list.
> >
> > I am sure that Frisian uses Latin, which is the opinion I
> as reviewer
> > can offer. I don't really care whether it has a Suppress Script or
> > not. I certainly don't see a NEED for it (who is writing Frisian in
> > anything else?) and the requesst for registration seems
> formal rather
> > than practical. Some people are saying that the Suppress Script is
> > badly designed. If you all want the requests processed, say
> so. If you
> > think this is an LTRU matter, say so.
> > --
> > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf-languages mailing list
> > Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> > http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf-languages mailing list
> Ietf-languages at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages
>
>
>