Suppress-Script for Korean?
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Jul 24 21:45:18 CEST 2007
Harald Tveit Alvestrand scripsit:
> You tickle my curiosity....
> where is it stated, authoritatively, that "Hang" is a proper subset of
The 15924 listing page at
http://www.unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html defines "Kore" thus:
Kore 287 Korean (alias for Hangul + Han) corÃ©en (alias pour hangÃ»l + han)
> Since I've been bemoaning the lack of lists of which characters a given
> script contains in other contexts (even while I was acknowledging that
> making such lists is a hard and extremely painful task), any hint that
> such lists may exist for a script tickles my curiosity.
See http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/Scripts.txt .
These properties are considered informative by Unicode. Now what is
a much harder problem is to say which characters are required by a
given *language*, and while there are a variety of partial answers,
there is nothing that approaches the authoritative.
Your worships will perhaps be thinking John Cowan
that it is an easy thing to blow up a dog? http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
[Or] to write a book?
--Don Quixote, Introduction cowan at ccil.org
More information about the Ietf-languages