[Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
cowan at ccil.org
Tue Jul 3 17:28:49 CEST 2007
Peter Constable scripsit:
> > the breakage to processors is no worse than adding new
> > fields (nor are there that many fully-conformant
> > processors to be fixed).
> I'm inclined to agree, but am waiting to see if anyone makes a strong counterargument.
Nobody actually knows how many fully conformant processors there are.
I still think the email argument is the compelling one. We *will*
have corruption no matter what.
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan
is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) cowan at ccil.org
More information about the Ietf-languages