[Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem

John Cowan cowan at ccil.org
Tue Jul 3 17:28:49 CEST 2007

Peter Constable scripsit:

> > the breakage to processors is no worse than adding new
> > fields (nor are there that many fully-conformant
> > processors to be fixed).
> I'm inclined to agree, but am waiting to see if anyone makes a strong counterargument.

Nobody actually knows how many fully conformant processors there are.

I still think the email argument is the compelling one.  We *will*
have corruption no matter what.

Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           cowan at ccil.org

More information about the Ietf-languages mailing list