[Ltru] Re: Solving the UTF-8 problem
petercon at microsoft.com
Tue Jul 3 17:24:32 CEST 2007
From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell at roadrunner.com]
> I restated three objections to converting the Registry to
> UTF-8, and tried to show why they don't outweigh the
> advantages of converting. All three are, in fact, true:
> 1. UTF-8 doesn't play well with e-mail.
> 2. Converting will break processors that expect only ASCII.
> 3. Some computers can't display UTF-8.
> But we can work out the e-mail problem
> And the display problem is really not as much of a
> showstopper as it is being portrayed. People are saying
> that the hex escapes are a display problem too...
+1. I don't see the display issue as being a show-stopper at all. Anybody that has a need to view this registry has access to means of viewing UTF-8.
> the breakage to processors is no worse than adding new
> fields (nor are there that many fully-conformant
> processors to be fixed).
I'm inclined to agree, but am waiting to see if anyone makes a strong counterargument.
More information about the Ietf-languages