[OT] Tied up in not's (was: Re: Sign languages)
dewell at adelphia.net
Tue Feb 21 16:05:50 CET 2006
Michael Everson <everson at evertype dot com> wrote:
>>> For the former, I am not convinced that not grouping all possible
>>> sign languages under a common "sgn-" umbrella constitutes "not
>>> helping the Deaf community very well."
>> That took some serious decoding with the three "not"s.
> That's because Mark is in "theory mode". :-)
That badly not'd sentence was my creation. Don't blame Mark.
Fullerton, California, USA
More information about the Ietf-languages