ISO 639 and RFC 3066bis
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
harald at alvestrand.no
Fri Jul 23 22:58:13 CEST 2004
--On 25. juni 2004 15:57 -0400 John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com> wrote:
> Addison Phillips [wM] scripsit:
>> If a code has been reserved so that it will not be assigned, then that
>> code is an unassigned code. Unassigned codes are not valid. Thus,
>> reserved codes are not valid.
> Correct. But we are already treating some of them as valid in RFC 3066
> (the transitionally reserved ones) and I'm arguing for treating some of
> the exceptionally reserved ones (the oddball territories) as valid too.
which reserved codes are we treating as valid in RFC 3066?
More information about the Ietf-languages