[Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5890 (4824)

[Markus Scherer]

On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 1:10 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor at rfc-editor.org
> wrote:

> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Because A-labels (the form actually used in the
> DNS) are potentially much more compressed than UTF-8 (and UTF-8 is,
> in general, more compressed that UTF-16 or UTF-32), U-labels that
> obey all of the relevant symmetry (and other) constraints of these
> documents may be quite a bit longer, potentially up to 59 Unicode
> code points, or up to 236 octets.
>
> Notes
> -----
> (The same rationale as my report for 2.3.2.1 applies:)
>

Same comment as I just sent for that other correction -- much better to
drop the ", or up to 236 octets": It is confusing and irrelevant.

Best regards,
markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20161007/9ee9046a/attachment-0001.html>