IDNABIS Working Group completes its work
patrik at frobbit.se
Tue Mar 16 13:32:42 CET 2010
On 16 mar 2010, at 10.40, Vint Cerf wrote:
> Reference to TR46 seemed to be desired by the AD
> but as you see from Patrik Faltsrom's detailed review of that draft
> document, there is much to discuss and debate.
Vint, I do not think everyone have seen the review. I did a review during the past weekend on request from Unicode Consortium and the IAB.
But, of course this is nothing secret. You can find the review on my blog:
Note though that this is MY personal review, written without any hat on.
And, there are disclaimers that I might have misunderstood things in the document -- which imply the only thing needed is that the document should be clarified so I do not misunderstand the next time I read it :-)
More information about the Idna-update