Last Call: draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Protocol) to Draft Standard
vint at google.com
Thu Oct 1 13:02:49 CEST 2009
that's a good question.
while the natural assumption may have been that IDNA2008 was a direct
modification of IDNA2003, the basis for the design seems sufficiently
different that it might merit only proposed standard status. I didn't
catch this when the announcement was sent.
Does anyone object to asking for proposed rather than draft status?
On Oct 1, 2009, at 4:51 AM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> Isn't the Last Call for Draft Standard, and one important criterion
> Draft Standard is implementations, so the implementation report is
> Regards, Martin.
> On 2009/10/01 5:11, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>> Sorry, that was part of the announcement boilerplate that's not
>> relevant to this Last Call -- I didn't notice it to remove it.
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:50 AM, SM<sm at resistor.net> wrote:
>>> At 07:12 29-09-2009, The IESG wrote:
>>>> The IESG has received a request from the Internationalized Domain
>>>> in Applications, Revised WG (idnabis) to consider the following
>>>> - 'Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA):
>>>> Protocol '
>>>> <draft-ietf-idnabis-protocol-16.txt> as a Draft Standard
>>>> Implementation Report can be accessed at
>>> That's a 404. Where can I find the implementation report?
>>> Idna-update mailing list
>>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
>> Idna-update mailing list
>> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> #-# Martin J. Dürst, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
> #-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
More information about the Idna-update