Sharp-S and Final Sigma Consensus Call Results
phoffman at imc.org
Wed Dec 9 16:54:20 CET 2009
At 10:51 AM -0500 12/9/09, Vint Cerf wrote:
>it hasn't been cut off - i have already committed to sending a draft in the next day or so to try to synthesize transition ideas.
Sorry, I didn't know that. In that case, why is there a rush to list the opinions of the WG participants? I, for one, would choose whether or not I am still in favor of PVALID for both based on how reasonable the transition proposals are.
More information about the Idna-update