Consensus Call on Latin Sharp S and Greek Final Sigma

Lisa Dusseault lisa.dusseault at gmail.com
Thu Dec 3 22:55:34 CET 2009


TATWEEL is not an open issue.  That was decided by WG consensus and is not
necessary to the resolution of the two issues that are open.

Thanks,
Lisa

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Elisabeth Blanconil
<eblanconil at gmail.com>wrote:

> hi! Folks,
>
> I roughly understand that all this is to keep this WG buzy for another year
> on IDNA, in destroying every agreement we painfully found. The target is to
> give some delays to ICANNN. So they can register new gTLDs but no IDNgTLD
> before every ccTLD has signed a contract with ICANN. It sounds reasonable
> and I am glad many participate.
>
> To obtain it; it was just enough to restart again the boring issues. This
> is why I am surprised nobody thought to discuss TATWEEL yet. What is the
> technical difference between TATWELL's disputed consensus case and the
> eszett and the greek final sigma cases? Also what about French majuscules
> and other issues that we have started the list.
>
> Best
> Elisabeth Blanconil
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idna-update mailing list
> Idna-update at alvestrand.no
> http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/idna-update
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/attachments/20091203/b8f6771c/attachment.htm 


More information about the Idna-update mailing list